In 2025, social media continues to be one of the most powerful tools for communication, entertainment, and commerce. However, the growth of influencer culture has also created fertile ground for fraudulent schemes. While many influencers build their reputation on authentic engagement, a significant number exploit their popularity to mislead audiences. TikTok and Instagram, the two most influential networks among younger users, have witnessed a wave of high-profile scams, affecting not only individuals but also brands and institutions that collaborate with these personalities. Understanding the mechanisms of these fraudulent practices is crucial to protect both users and the digital ecosystem as a whole.
This year, several notable scandals exposed how influencers used their platforms to promote non-existent products and fake investment opportunities. For example, a wave of fraudulent “crypto collaborations” on TikTok convinced thousands of young investors to transfer money into so-called blockchain start-ups that disappeared within weeks. Similar practices were spotted on Instagram, where lifestyle influencers promoted counterfeit luxury goods, presenting them as authentic partnerships with high-end brands.
Another significant case involved influencers advertising fraudulent beauty products. Many followers, attracted by seemingly professional endorsements, purchased skincare items that later turned out to contain harmful or unregulated ingredients. Health experts have warned that this trend represents not only financial fraud but also a serious public health issue. Such cases have forced regulatory bodies in the EU and UK to review advertising rules for online personalities.
Beyond product-related fraud, some influencers engaged in charity scams. They created emotional campaigns around humanitarian crises, only to redirect donations to private accounts. By leveraging trust and urgency, these individuals exploited audiences’ empathy, making the scams particularly harmful from both ethical and financial perspectives.
The response from affected communities has been significant. Victims have increasingly turned to online forums and consumer protection agencies to share their experiences. Many described feelings of betrayal, as they had built long-term trust in these influencers. The damage extended beyond financial losses to emotional consequences, particularly among younger followers who viewed these personalities as role models.
Media coverage in 2025 highlighted several victim stories, giving visibility to the scale of the problem. One case involved a group of students in London who collectively lost thousands of pounds after following financial advice from a TikTok influencer. Their case became symbolic of how easily trust can be monetised in digital spaces. Stories like these have created a public debate about accountability and the role of social media companies.
Victims’ testimonies are now pushing policymakers to demand more responsibility from both influencers and the platforms hosting them. While some cases have led to legal action, others revealed the difficulty of pursuing international fraud where perpetrators operate across jurisdictions, making global cooperation more urgent.
Scammers adapt their tactics to current trends, making detection increasingly difficult. In 2025, one common strategy is the use of deepfake technology. Fraudsters create fake collaborations with celebrities by producing manipulated videos that appear authentic. These clips circulate rapidly, blurring the line between genuine endorsements and fabricated content.
Another method involves exploiting algorithms. Fraudulent influencers purchase fake engagement—likes, comments, and followers—to create an illusion of credibility. With inflated statistics, they attract brand collaborations and manipulate audiences into believing in their popularity and reliability. This manipulation makes it harder for ordinary users to distinguish genuine influencers from fraudsters.
Many scammers also rely on psychological tactics. They build a sense of exclusivity and urgency, offering “limited-time” investment opportunities or “secret” product launches. Such approaches pressure users into rapid decisions without proper verification. This psychological manipulation is particularly effective among young audiences who are less experienced in critical evaluation of online content.
Despite growing awareness, audiences continue to fall victim to these schemes due to several psychological and social factors. Influencers often position themselves as relatable individuals, blurring the boundary between friendship and commercial relationships. Followers tend to trust them more than traditional advertisements because of this perceived intimacy.
The design of TikTok and Instagram also contributes to vulnerability. Both platforms prioritise fast, emotionally engaging content, leaving little room for fact-checking. Short videos and visually persuasive posts make fraudulent claims appear convincing, especially when wrapped in polished aesthetics and storytelling techniques.
Additionally, the cultural pressure to follow trends intensifies the problem. Younger users in particular fear missing out on opportunities endorsed by their favourite influencers. This social dynamic makes them more likely to take risks without sufficient due diligence, enabling scammers to operate effectively in large numbers.
Governments and social media companies in 2025 have responded by tightening regulations and introducing stricter verification processes. For instance, the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) now requires influencers to provide documented proof of product authenticity before promotional campaigns. TikTok and Instagram have also enhanced their reporting tools, allowing users to flag suspicious content more effectively.
Educational initiatives are another important measure. Schools and universities in Europe and North America have started integrating digital literacy courses that teach students how to evaluate online content critically. These programmes emphasise fact-checking, recognising manipulation techniques, and understanding financial risks, equipping younger generations with tools to resist scams.
In addition, many brands are rethinking their collaboration policies. Instead of relying solely on engagement metrics, companies now demand transparent performance reports and background checks before signing contracts with influencers. This shift not only protects businesses but also reduces opportunities for fraudulent actors to exploit commercial partnerships.
For ordinary users, protecting themselves requires vigilance and critical thinking. Experts recommend checking whether influencers disclose their partnerships transparently and whether their claims can be verified through independent sources. If an offer sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Users should also be cautious of emotional appeals, particularly those involving charity donations or urgent investment opportunities. Verifying organisations and using official channels to contribute can significantly reduce risks. Relying on reputable review sites and consumer protection services adds an extra layer of safety.
Finally, reporting suspicious behaviour remains one of the most effective tools. Both TikTok and Instagram have mechanisms that allow users to flag scams. The more actively audiences participate in this process, the harder it becomes for fraudsters to maintain visibility and credibility online.